Zafer Gen\u00e7, 1974 y\u0131l\u0131nda Kas\u0131mpa\u015fa’daki Camialt\u0131 Tersanesi’nde 1. s\u0131n\u0131f elektrik kaynak\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmaya ba\u015flad\u0131. 1990 y\u0131l\u0131nda emekli olan Zafer Gen\u00e7, emeklili\u011finden 19 y\u0131l sonra, 2009 y\u0131l\u0131nda akci\u011fer zar\u0131 kanseri hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131na yakaland\u0131. Zafer Gen\u00e7, 23 Mart 2012 tarihinde meslek hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 nedeniyle i\u015f yapamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6stererek, Beyo\u011flu Sosyal G\u00fcvenlik M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc’ne ba\u015fvurdu. Beyo\u011flu SGM, Gen\u00e7’in i\u015f g\u00f6remezlik ayl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ba\u011flanmas\u0131 talebini reddetti. Gen\u00e7, 30 May\u0131s 2012 tarihinde yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 kanser hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131na yenilerek hayat\u0131n\u0131 kaybetti.<\/p>\n
Y\u00dcKSEK SA\u011eLIK KURULU MESLEK HASTALI\u011eI \u0130DD\u0130ASINI KABUL ETMED\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n Gen\u00e7’in e\u015fi Aysel Gen\u00e7’in ba\u015fvurusu \u00fczerine Sosyal Sigorta Y\u00fcksek Sa\u011fl\u0131k Kurulu, 16 Nisan 2014 tarihinde, Zafer Gen\u00e7’in yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu meslek ile yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 hastal\u0131k aras\u0131nda ili\u015fki bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verdi.<\/p>\n E\u015e\u0130 VE O\u011eLU DAVA A\u00c7TI<\/strong><\/p>\n Gen\u00e7’in e\u015fi Aysel Gen\u00e7 ile o\u011flu Mustafa Zafer Gen\u00e7, Y\u00fcksek Sa\u011fl\u0131k Kurulu’nun bu karar\u0131 \u00fczerine mahkemeye ba\u015fvurdu. Davac\u0131lar ad\u0131na 2016 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u0130stanbul 20. \u0130\u015f Mahkemesi’ne ba\u015fvuran Avukat Sinem Ezgi B\u00fcy\u00fcky\u0131ld\u0131z, SGK Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130stanbul \u0130l M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve T\u00fcrkiye Denizcilik \u0130\u015fletmeleri A.\u015e. aleyhine dava a\u00e7t\u0131. Zafer Gen\u00e7’in yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u015f nedeniyle uzun y\u0131llar asbeste maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, asbestin etkisinin 20 y\u0131la kadar s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc belirterek, meslek hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 nedeni ile \u00f6l\u00fcp \u00f6lmedi\u011finin ve bu hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131n sebep oldu\u011fu maluliyet oran\u0131n\u0131n tespitini istedi.<\/p>\n ADL\u0130 TIP KURUMU MESLEK HASTALI\u011eI DED\u0130<\/strong><\/p>\n Mahkeme, Adli T\u0131p 1. \u0130htisas Kurulu’ndan rapor istedi. Mahkemeye gelen 7 Haziran 2017 tarihli raporda, 1. s\u0131n\u0131f elektrik\u00e7i olarak \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan m\u00fcteveffan\u0131n asbeste maruz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131, asbeste maruz kald\u0131ktan 10 y\u0131l sonras\u0131na kadar hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131n belirtilerinin ortaya \u00e7\u0131kabilece\u011fi, asbestin mezotelyoma etkisinin t\u0131bben bilindi\u011fi, ki\u015fide tespit edilen mezotelyoman\u0131n meslek hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 olabilece\u011fi belirtildi. Adli T\u0131p Kurumu 3. \u00dcst Kurulu da dava dosyas\u0131na yollad\u0131\u011f\u0131 26 Nisan 2018 tarihli raporunda, Zafer Gen\u00e7’in mezotelyoma hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn ve yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131 bu hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131n da meslek hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011funun kabul\u00fcn\u00fcn gerekti\u011fi belirtildi. Daval\u0131lar SGK Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130stanbul \u0130l M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, T\u00fcrkiye Denizcilik \u0130\u015fletmeleri davan\u0131n reddini istediler.<\/p>\n MAHKEME DAVAYI KABUL ETT\u0130 DAVALILAR KARARI \u0130ST\u0130NAF’A TA\u015eIDI<\/strong><\/p>\n Karar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klayan mahkeme, davay\u0131 kabul etti. Mahkeme, Adli T\u0131p Kurumu’ndan gelen raporlar\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6stererek Zafer Gen\u00e7’in mesle\u011finden dolay\u0131 mezotelyoma hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131na yakaland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ve \u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn de bu hastal\u0131ktan kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131na karar verdi. Daval\u0131lar, SGK Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130stanbul \u0130l M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve T\u00fcrkiye Denizcilik \u0130\u015fletmeleri, yerel mahkemenin karar\u0131n\u0131 istinaf mahkemesine ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131.<\/p>\n \u0130ST\u0130NAF VE YARGITAY YEREL MAHKEMEN\u0130N KARARINI ONADI<\/strong><\/p>\n Yerel mahkemenin karar\u0131n\u0131 2021 y\u0131l\u0131nda inceleyen \u0130stanbul B\u00f6lge Adliye Mahkemesi 33. Hukuk Dairesi, daval\u0131 kurumlar\u0131n istinaf talebini reddederek karar\u0131 onad\u0131. Daval\u0131lar bu kez de \u0130stinaf’\u0131n karar\u0131na temyiz ba\u015fvurusuna bulundu. 2021 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n Aral\u0131k ay\u0131nda karar\u0131 inceleyen Yarg\u0131tay 10. Hukuk Dairesi, karar\u0131n yasal ve hukuksal gerek\u00e7eleriyle dayand\u0131\u011f\u0131 maddi delillere ve \u00f6zellikle delillerin takdirinde bir isabetsizlik g\u00f6r\u00fclmedi\u011fine kanaat getirdi. Temyiz itirazlar\u0131n\u0131 reddeden Daire, usul ve hukuka uygun olarak g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc h\u00fckm\u00fcn onanmas\u0131na karar verdi.<\/p>\n 250 B\u0130N L\u0130RALIK TAZM\u0130NAT DAVASI<\/strong><\/p>\n Kesinle\u015fme \u015ferhinin yaz\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n ard\u0131ndan ailenin avukat\u0131 Sinem Ezgi B\u00fcy\u00fcky\u0131ld\u0131z, daval\u0131 \u015firketlere maddi ve manevi olmak \u00fczere toplamda 250 bin liral\u0131k tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131.<\/p>\n ‘EMSAL TE\u015eK\u0130L ETM\u0130\u015eT\u0130R \u0130NSANLAR \u0130\u00c7\u0130N UMUT OLMU\u015eTUR’<\/strong><\/p>\n DHA’ya konu\u015fan Avukat Sinem Ezgi B\u00fcy\u00fcky\u0131ld\u0131z, 2016 y\u0131l\u0131nda yerel mahkemede bu konuya ili\u015fkin dava a\u00e7t\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00f6yledi. 2019 y\u0131l\u0131nda yerel mahkemenin lehlerine karar verdi\u011fini, \u0130stinaf’\u0131n ve Yarg\u0131tay’\u0131n da karar\u0131 onad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vurgulayan B\u00fcy\u00fcky\u0131ld\u0131z, “Dosyam\u0131z emsal te\u015fkil etmi\u015ftir, insanlar i\u00e7in de umut olmu\u015ftur. \u015eimdi tazminat davas\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131k. Dileyelim t\u00fcm insanlar i\u00e7in bu umut olsun. Ger\u00e7ekten de T\u00fcrkiye’de \u00e7ok az say\u0131da bu konuda karar vard\u0131r ve bizim i\u00e7in de \u00e7ok b\u00fcy\u00fck bir \u015fans oldu, umut verdi” dedi. <\/p>\n ‘MEZOTELYOMA \u0130L\u0130\u015eK\u0130N T\u00dcRK\u0130YE’DE B\u00d6YLE B\u0130R KARAR YOKTU’<\/strong><\/p>\n Hukuki s\u00fcrecin toplam 5 y\u0131l s\u00fcrd\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc hat\u0131rlatan B\u00fcy\u00fcky\u0131ld\u0131z, “Ke\u015fke hepimiz i\u00e7in daha k\u0131sa soluklu bir s\u00fcre\u00e7 olsayd\u0131. Dileyelim bundan sonra yarg\u0131da sistem daha h\u0131zl\u0131 ilerleyebilsin. 5 y\u0131l kadar insanlar beklemesin. Bu \u00e7ok uzun bir s\u00fcre hepimiz i\u00e7in. Daha \u00f6nce ta\u015flama i\u015f\u00e7ilerinde buna benzer bir karar vard\u0131. Mezotelyoma ili\u015fkin T\u00fcrkiye’de b\u00f6yle karar yoktu. \u015eu an art\u0131k var” \u015feklinde konu\u015ftu. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Yarg\u0131tay, emekli olduktan 19 y\u0131l sonra kansere yakalanan, 2012 y\u0131l\u0131nda da ya\u015fam\u0131n\u0131 yitiren elektrik kaynak\u00e7\u0131s\u0131 Zafer Gen\u00e7’in meslek hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan \u00f6ld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcne dair yerel mahkemenin verdi\u011fi karar\u0131 onad\u0131. Karar\u0131n ard\u0131ndan aile, SGK Ba\u015fkanl\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u0130stanbul \u0130l M\u00fcd\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve T\u00fcrkiye Denizcilik \u0130\u015fletmeleri A.\u015e.’ye 250 bin liral\u0131k maddi ve manevi tazminat davas\u0131 a\u00e7t\u0131. Ailenin avukat\u0131 Sinem Ezgi B\u00fcy\u00fcky\u0131ld\u0131z, karar\u0131n emsal te\u015fkil etti\u011fini belirterek, “T\u00fcrkiye’de \u00e7ok az say\u0131da bu konuda karar vard\u0131r” dedi.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":6,"featured_media":11005,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[28],"tags":[527,1119,73,1828,2482],"class_list":["post-11003","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-istanbul","tag-kanser","tag-mahkeme","tag-manset","tag-meslek","tag-sgk"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ihm.tr\/tr-int\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11003","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ihm.tr\/tr-int\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ihm.tr\/tr-int\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ihm.tr\/tr-int\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/6"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ihm.tr\/tr-int\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=11003"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.ihm.tr\/tr-int\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11003\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11006,"href":"https:\/\/www.ihm.tr\/tr-int\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/11003\/revisions\/11006"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ihm.tr\/tr-int\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/11005"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ihm.tr\/tr-int\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=11003"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ihm.tr\/tr-int\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=11003"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ihm.tr\/tr-int\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=11003"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}